Our website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with this notice and the Terms of Use.
Submit manuscript
Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Journals / Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia / Issue 2, 2023 / Issues of proving some corruption offenses committed by officers of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation
UDC
328.185
VAK Russia
5.1.2

ISSUES OF PROVING SOME CORRUPTION OFFENSES COMMITTED BY OFFICERS OF THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Issues of proving some corruption offenses committed by officers of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

Published in Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia · Pages 51–61 · Rubric: PUBLIC LAW (STATE LAW) SCIENCES
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2023-2-51-61
Received: 16.08.2022 Accepted: 31.05.2023 Published: 29.06.2023 Language of publication: RUS
Authors
NA
Nadezhda Dudina
ORCID
ABSTRACT
Introduction. The article is devoted to a critical analysis of the concepts of «corruption», «corruption offense» through the prism of the current legislation of the Russian Federation and other countries, as well as the views of scientists in this field. The lack of legal regulation of the concept of «corruption offense» can give rise to legal uncertainty and errors in proving guilt of an illegal act committed by an officer of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. Research methods. Empirical methods of comparison, description, observation, interpretation; methods of formal logic; analysis and generalisation of scientific and regulatory materials, analysis of judicial practice. Results Including Key conclusions. The necessity of introducing the legislative concept of «corruption offense» with the definition of its types and severity is argued. The conclusion is substantiated that the procedures for verifying the completeness and reliability of information on income, property and property obligations submitted by an internal affairs officer, as well as the procedure for establishing control over expenses, are special types of jurisdictional disciplinary proceedings with their inherent stages, but the absence of regulated procedural actions, aimed at proving a «corruption offence».
KEYWORDS
corruption offense, jurisdictional proceedings, checking the completeness and reliability of information, establishing cost control, proving guilt
Text References
Text
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Dudina N. A. K voprosu o ponyatii korrupcii v deystvuyuschem rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve // Obrazovanie i nauka v Rossii i za rubezhom. - 2018. - № 11 (46). - S. 144-148.

2. Saetgaraev V. F. Razgranichenie korrupcionnoy deyatel'nosti s pozicii administrativnogo i ugolovnogo prava kak faktor sovershenstvovaniya ocenki protivodeystviya korrupcii // Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2021. - № 2 (44). - S. 261-267.

3. Channov S. E. Mozhet li korrupcionnyy prostupok byt' maloznachitel'nym? // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2014. - № 10. - S. 2197-2203.

4. Murashkin I. Yu. Sub'ekty korrupcionnyh pravonarusheniy // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. - 2019. - № 8. - S. 49-52.

5. Zyryanova I. A. K voprosu o ponyatii korrupcionnogo pravonarusheniya v izbiratel'nom processe // Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2014. - № 2. - S. 192-195.

6. Schedrin N. V. O korrupcii, korrupcionerah i korrupcionnoy vygode // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2014. - № 3. - S. 1450.

7. Lipinskiy D. A. K voprosu o ponyatii korrupcionnogo pravonarusheniya // Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravoohranitel'naya praktika. - 2017. - № 3 (41). - S. 100-108.

8. Dobrobaba M. B., Channov S. E. Otvetstvennost' gosudarstvennyh sluzhaschih za korrupcionnye pravonarusheniya: problemy optimizacii modeli // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2021. - T. 25. - № 11. - S. 88-101.

9. Kuznecov V. I., Truncevskiy Yu. V., Lomakina L. A. Uvol'nenie gosudarstvennyh grazhdanskih sluzhaschih v svyazi s utratoy doveriya: problemy teorii i praktiki // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2020. - № 1. - S. 159-169.

10. Grigor'ev I. V., Kripak M. V. Osobennosti disciplinarnoy otvetstvennosti gosudarstvennyh sluzhaschih za korrupcionnye pravonarusheniya // Administrativnoe i municipal'noe pravo. - 2018. - № 5. - S. 1-10.

11. Korobchenko V. V., Ivankina T. V. Pravovaya priroda otvetstvennosti grazhdanskih sluzhaschih za korrupcionnye pravonarusheniya // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. - 2016. - № 7 (68). - S. 31-41.

12. Zaykovskiy V. N., Davydov V. G. Pravonarusheniya korrupcionnogo haraktera: obschaya harakteristika, posledstviya, problemy minimizacii i likvidacii // Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba. - 2019. - № 6 (122). - S. 27-34.

13. Grandonyan K. A., Shapovalov A. A. Institut yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti za korrupcionnye pravonarusheniya v Rossii: istoriya stanovleniya i sovremennoe sostoyanie // Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. - 2018. - № 1 (51). - S. 26-34.

14. Babaeva E. U., Uvarov V. N. Obstoyatel'stva, podlezhaschie ustanovleniyu i dokazyvaniyu pri rassledovanii prestupleniy korrupcionnoy napravlennosti // Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina. - 2017. - № 5 (33). - S. 90-98.

15. Truncevskiy Yu. V. Disciplinarnaya i sudebnaya praktika po delam ob uvol'nenii za korrupcionnoe pravonarushenie v svyazi s utratoy doveriya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. - 2020. - № 11. - S. 155 - 173.

PDF Text JATS XML
The contact persons
Larisa Kaverina
Editor in chief
Larisa Kaverina
journalspbmvd@mail.ru +7(812)730-26-96
Eliana Ytrobina
Editorial office
Eliana Ytrobina
demushkina.eliana@mail.ru +7(911)959-89-96
6981
downloads
RINC RINC Science Index Crossref VAK Cyberleninka Google Scholar Ulrichs
© epinb.ru
Agreement Personal data protection and processing policy Support Powered by Editorum, 2026 Instructions
Login or Create
* Forgot your password?